EricGagne

+Clients
  • Content count

    410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About EricGagne

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

6,150 profile views
  1. Not a problem, I can still use your mod for tags and prefixes, I will just have to find a different solution for my topic statuses.
  2. I installed this mod today and I can't get it to work the way I want so I am thinking now maybe it can't do it. Say I have predefined tags T1,T2, T3 and prefixes P1,P2 and P3. I don't want the users to be able to use tags as prefixes and prefixes as tags. This works one way, my tags cannot be used as prefixes but the prefixes can be used as tags which, for my case defeats the purpose. I want to use the prefixes as a status so a topic can either be P1, P2 or P3, it cannot be a combination of 2 or 3 but it's confusing for the reader if the topic starter uses P1 as a prefix and then P2 as a tag. The readers will not know the status of the topic. Is there a way I can prevent the users from using Prefixes as tags ?
  3. ​Sorry Charles but you're totally wrong on this. It does actually makes sense
  4. ​This the one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJpB_AEZf6U
  5. Bob Dylan - Knockin' on heaven's door live long version and soooooooooooo goooood !
  6. board

    ​Charles, May I suggest that while evaluating you also consider adding an option in the advanced search for "all words" ?
  7. 3.4.x only allows to control ads visibility by group but we have a situation where it would be best for us to show ads to everyone but only in some categories and forums. Is this possible in 4.0 ?
  8. board

    ​Is this a confirmation that you are going to do it ?
  9. board

    Here's another real life example. I am trying to find topics on how to use my own css in IP.Content blocks. I searched for "content css block" (without the quotes). I cannot specify titles only nor can I say I only want results that contain all the words. How many posts do we have in this board that contain either of these words and yet have absolutely nothing to do with what I am looking for ?. The 4th result is a topic titled "SQL Error upgrading from 3.2.3 to 3.3". That does not remotely relate to my search. I would much rather search on titles and be told nothing relevant was found than have to filter nearly 3000 results to see if maybe one of them gives me something. Sriously, I don't mean to be rude but ever since this board was moved to IPB 4 the search has been useless to me. It gives so many unrelated results, it's faster (not to be confused with "fast") to just go to the specific forum, like IP.Content in this case, and browse through pages and page and pages of topic titles until I find one that seems to be talking about what I need.
  10. Here's three things I would absolutely love in IPB and I think many on my community would also use it. 1. An "Hide from new content" option on topics. Very often there's topics I would prefer not to see in the New Content because they are of less importance to me and I'd rather just read them later by going through the forum index than seeing them on New Content many times a day. 2. A "Mark Priority" option on forums and topics which would make them appear at the top of the New Content page and be identifed as priority with some icon. 3. A "Invite people" feature on topics. This would allow the "Invited" people to participate in a discussion when it's in a forum they don't see or in which they only have read-only access. I'm not entirely sure how permissions would work on this but what I am thinking for now is two settings in the "Edit forum" page: Groups that can be invited. Members of these groups can be invited to topics in this forum.Groups allowed to invite. Members of these groups are allowed to invite people to topics in this forum.Here's why we would love these features. We currently have 133 forums in our community and many permissions groups depending on one's position in the organization (Administrator, Executive, club representative, club member, etc). We plan on opening up the community to the public now and we will easily end up with 150 to 175 forums and an average of over 300 new messages each day. Our executives have access to everything because they need to feel the pulse of our community but they can only spend so much time a day on the forum and they need to be able to filter out the discussions that don't specifically require them to read every new post. This is where suggestions 1 and 2 would be an invaluable tool for them, making their lives so much easier by giving them tools to prioritize new content. I don't think suggestion #3 requires any explanation.
  11. board

    Charles, You said in another topic that the search results are prioritized to show titles results before content so I can appreciate why you don't see a need for search by titles only. But what about performance ? Wouldn't a search be much faster and less resource intensive on a large community database if it was not uselessly searching content only to show results that the user is not interested in ?
  12. Sometimes I'm on the other side too but I think if we feel free to give thumbs down when we're not happy then the least we can do is give thumbs up when we are.
  13. I have been a software developer for nearly 30 years now. I work on business applications and ERP Systems. So though I don't know much about html, css, javascript and all that stuff, I think I have a fair idea of the amount of work and pressure it must be for them to "test live" and debug a beta version in their very own support forum while still providing the same quality of service to all of us customers. I have submitted 8 support tickets in the last 3 weeks or so and they were all dealt with as quickly and efficiently as always. So Invision's staff, kudos to all of you !!
  14. We are on a hosted community, do I have to patch this myself or is it done automatically ? I am a bit confused because the files in the patch are clear php but the ones on the server appear to be zend files.
  15. Beutiful. I like that, much more friendly. Thx IN10TION