Jυra Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 <p>1. When I toggle off the fancy mode I still want to click BBcode buttons, but they're all faded out.<br /> 2. It should be easier to remove or hide icons from the editor like the code button on a forum that doesn't have a use for it. Maybe someone only wants to display the basics as opposed to a Las Vegas casino.</p> <p>3. Changing the link title in fancy mode isn't easy or user friendly. I find myself switching off fancy mode to edit it.</p> <p>4. A way to turn off the copy and paste copying of the text size and font, etc.</p> <p> </p> <p>The current editor is like sticking plastic lawn chairs (the editor) in a Bugatti Veyron (IPB). I'd rather have an editor hand crafted by IPS.</p> I tried posting this after switching on and off the editing mode and it didn't show the topic. I hit back to copy my text to repost and I get the HTML stuff. My third time trying to post this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insectdude Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Posts will continue getting trashed like this until IPS either implement the native BBCode mode for CKEditor, or (my vastly preferred option) restore the option of using IPS's home-grown standard editor as seen in 3.1. No amount of bug fixing is going to cure the underlying cause of converting back and forth between HTML and BBCode within the editor. I hope a final solution for this is already under development for IPB 3.4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Welsh_One Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 It's an absolute joke. I have had a number of complaints from my members and to be honest the are getting rather fed up with it. Useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morrigan Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Just because I'm sitting here fighting with my mod to upgrade to use the CKeditor I'd like to say I kind of agree. I would totally prefer the old IPS editor back. I have been fighting to be able to implement it for 2 days and over 12 hours just trying to get it to function as intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sefket Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Please bring back the old editor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royzee Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Please bring back the old editor. $quote++; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulobrien Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 YES, please please please! P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perhonorificus_merged Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Adding my vote for the standard IPB editor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimi Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Are we talking about the one in 3.1.4? If so then +1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genestoy Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Good luck - see my post here and Matt's response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jυra Posted May 11, 2012 Author Share Posted May 11, 2012 "We didn't receive any financial gains for using it." I don't think most features of IPB gives IPS any financial gain if it's thought of like such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirill N Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 I've created a poll about this suggestion, please vote :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.