Brandon D Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 Yes. I've tried to ignore it. But, I'm weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigiRock Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 u mean the light color change from the background and the logo right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amy T Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 I thought that was intentional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Four Year Strong Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 If that's the worse thing in IPB 3.2 then you know that IPB did one hell of a job. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lewis P Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 Yeah, that indeed is a PITA. I'm sure Rikki will be onto it though. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon D Posted June 3, 2011 Author Share Posted June 3, 2011 u mean the light color change from the background and the logo right? Yes! Where the left gradient of the logo image does not blend into the header background, like the right side does. If that's the worse thing in IPB 3.2 then you know that IPB did one hell of a job. :tongue: IPB 3.2 is a great achievement no doubt. I just have issues :frantics: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xChris777 Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 Nice catch. I'm sure the IPS team is cracking down on the case now. ;) They want it PERFECT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sledgemoto Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 The worst thing about 3.2 The fact that it is not available yet :baby: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie. Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 bug report was aready posted by bfarber i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enkidu Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 I need to change my glasses...spacsavers, here I come! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shamil Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 The other end isn't clean either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chito Posted June 3, 2011 Share Posted June 3, 2011 THAT is the worse for you????...Wow, I can barely see the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telemacus2 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Personally, I have trouble digesting the aesthetics of the title bar at the top. I'm sure this can be easily modified though, but I wish it looked a little more like this: And also, I wish adding items to menus wasn't so complicated (you normally need a mod for it). If you've got several add-ons to your forums, you know what I'm talking about (when all the menu items do not fit in, it doesn't look too good...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ᴡᴅツ Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted June 4, 2011 Management Share Posted June 4, 2011 I posted a bug report about that earlier :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glumbo Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 You make a strong point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(e) Eric Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 wow, I didn't even notice. Now that I do, I can't take my eyes of it! :logik: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glumbo Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 wow, I didn't even notice. Now that I do, I can't take my eyes of it! :logik: You're right. I don't think I'll be able to sleep properly until this is fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Personally, I have trouble digesting the aesthetics of the title bar at the top. I'm sure this can be easily modified though, but I wish it looked a little more like this: And also, I wish adding items to menus wasn't so complicated (you normally need a mod for it). If you've got several add-ons to your forums, you know what I'm talking about (when all the menu items do not fit in, it doesn't look too good...) Adding a link is as simple as adding one line of code..... not sure why you need a mod for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telemacus2 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Adding one or 2 is fine, but say you add... 5 or more. The width of the bar is not long enough and it messes up the whole menu. That's why things like "Fusion menu" were created. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex K. Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Adding one or 2 is fine, but say you add... 5 or more. The width of the bar is not long enough and it messes up the whole menu. That's why things like "Fusion menu" were created. It was kind of a mess in 3.1, but it's actually not too bad in 3.2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telemacus2 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 That's definitely better than 3.1, yes. :) Although you'll have to admit that foldable menus would look better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(e) Eric Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 Plus Alex K needs a photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BriBri8998 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 bug report was aready posted by bfarber i think WHY have I heard of that screen name before? And they could always center there logo and make both sides blend. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robulosity2 Posted June 4, 2011 Share Posted June 4, 2011 It was honestly the first thing I noticed lol -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.